(This post is similar to a post from 3 years ago, though here I hope to point out something I didn’t then. The quote below also appears in that post in a much shorter form.)
As one reads through Kenneth Roberts’ essays, she will notice his disgust with the so-called experts of his day on issues such as planting, fishing, and diets. The way in which he directs his disgust towards them, though, is quite humorous as he makes himself the ignorant, hapless soul (regarding whatever topic he is discussing) while mentioning the experts and their views in rather glowing, hyperbolic language. The result is akin to the philosopher’s tool of reductio ad absurdum: the picture Roberts’ paints in reality makes the “expert” look rather silly and ignorant while Roberts emerges from the essay unscathed by the fad of the day.
Perhaps the best illustration of Roberts’ method is presented in a quote from his essay “An Inquiry Into Diets” found in his For Authors Only and The Kenneth Roberts Reader:
One of the foremost diet books says that if a person follows the proper diet, he becomes tranquil, thoughtful, and philosophic; overwork is impossible; business worries are unknown; irritation vanishes. It was all too clear to me that I was in a bad way; for whenever my eye struck a newspaper report of the activities of the House of Representatives, I became irritated. Almost everything that was done in the House of Representatives seemed irritating…
When I read about such things, I not only become irritated: I become profane – so profane that my language sometimes shocks even myself.
This, of course, is another sure indication of acidosis. If I were on a proper diet, nothing could imitate me. I would remain tranquil and philosophic while reading about the House of Representatives. I would continue to be tranquil and philosophic, event though the House of Representatives should be successful in its efforts to bring the nation to insolvency and ruin.
I may as well be frank. The diet books had me, to put it crudely, scared (In The Kenneth Roberts Reader, 88-89).
And such is Roberts’ attitude toward dieticians in this particular example, and to so-called experts on the whole. In a day when it seems we’re inundated with a cacophony of voices telling us what to do, it is somewhat refreshing to know that this is nothing new, but has gone on for quite some time. And in the midst of the noise of self-proclaimed experts, Kenneth Roberts added his voice among those voices calling people back to common sense and reason.
Filed under: For Authors Only, Kenneth Roberts the Man, The Kenneth Roberts Reader | Tagged: An Inquiry Into Diets, diet books, diets, For Authors Only, reductio ad absurdum, The Kenneth Roberts Reader |